Curious how the REMC–ALP model could work in your state or district? Here are answers to the most common questions education leaders ask about scaling professional learning systems that stay connected to real classrooms.
Can a statewide model like this work in my district or state?
Yes. The REMC–ALP partnership was designed to be flexible and scalable. While Michigan has a specific network structure, the same approach can be adapted to different contexts. ALP works with state agencies, regional centers, and district teams to build professional learning systems that fit local priorities and existing governance models.
What if my state doesn’t have a REMC-equivalent network?
A structure like REMC helps, but it is not required. What matters is collaboration. Many states and regions have built similar systems by bringing districts and education service agencies together under a shared professional learning vision. ALP helps partners assess what already exists, then design a coordinated model that supports educators at every level.
Do I need a corporate or vendor partner like Dell to do this?
No. While Dell Technologies and People Driven Technologies have played a valuable role in Michigan’s initiative by supporting technology access and professional learning, ALP supports partners who fund their systems through state programs, cooperative purchasing, or district consortiums. The most important factor is sustained leadership commitment to educator growth, not corporate sponsorship.
How do you know this model makes a difference in learning outcomes?
REMC and ALP have extensive feedback from educators, and the results are clear: courses are relevant, engaging, and lead to changes in classroom practice. Participant completion rates are four times higher than the national average for virtual learning. The partnership is now gathering statewide aggregate data to better measure student-level outcomes, while continuing to prioritize reflection, applied learning, and educator confidence as indicators of success.
Why is every course reviewed and refreshed on a three-year cycle?
Technology and teaching practices evolve quickly, and professional learning must evolve with them. The three-year review process ensures that every course remains current, accessible, and immediately useful. Topics like AI literacy and digital citizenship are added regularly, while outdated materials are retired. This cycle keeps content fresh and aligned with what educators face in real classrooms.
What makes experiential learning so important in this model?
Educators learn best when they can apply ideas directly to their work. Every REMC course includes opportunities for practice, reflection, and feedback. Participants leave with classroom-ready strategies, not just information. This approach builds confidence, encourages curiosity, and helps teachers see immediate results with their students.
Interested in meeting and exceeding professional learning needs for teachers in your school, district, or state?
Contact ALP to start a conversation.
Read our related three-part blog series exploring lessons from a statewide professional learning partnership: Building Partnerships That Last, How to Design Professional Learning That Sticks, and Building Human-Centered Professional Learning Systems at Scale.